Milo I do not object to you posting here. I have stated that before. I simply used this opportunity to remind you. During that time of scolding of me, by your fellow countryman, When I took the liberty of the coffeehouse asking you about such that was reported here (by the leftist news by the way) of pregnant woman, in Australia, arrested in her own home, in front of her children, as she was preparing to go and have a scheduled ultrasound done.. Even though I was scolded for such, and told to mind my own business. You spoke not one word in my defense even though I may be one of your strongest supporters for your country as well. If you had of spoken up, I would have said nothing of you posting of our business here. I took this opportunity to state; While here in the Coffeehouse in the future; I do not want to hear one word the next time I post of your business. I have seen PLENTY to post about there, while having my coffee here. This whole little off the trail, is something I took as a good time to remind you of such since you have given me the opportunity.. Thank You. lol
Now that aside, to the subject at hand, I have not ask If any court has or has not heard Mr Binalls' sworn statement under oath. I am not arguing or asking if any; court system has or has not thrown out Mr Binalls statement for whatever reason. Be it any stipulation, objection, or any other reason, short of Mr Binalls statement being a lie. I am not asking if any; or all stipulations, dates, timelines, etc have or have not been met. I have simply asked one of my fellow Americans; One American to another, Is Mr Binalls' statement a lie: If so which part . I do not know if Our Supreme Court will or will not hear Mr Binalls' sworn statement of evidence. I do not even know if it has been appealed to that Court. And if it has been appealed and does get heard, I will not speculate what their ruling may or may not be if they do hear his evidence shown Under Oath before the Senate Homeland Security hearing on election fraud... My question of concern is, and has been from the start. Which part of Mr Binalls' statement is simply not true? I have searched, studied, I can not disprove his statement or any part of it. He states UNDER OATH that at least 130,000 ballots in Arizona alone are invalid. The previous debater could not show where any of Mr Binalls' statement was a lie as I was asking him (one American to another), hoping if he knew otherwise he would show such. I will ask you as I ask the previous "debater" which of the following is not true? As I ask, One American who is a strong supporter of your country, to an Australian who is a strong supporter of my country; Which of the following is a lie? This is an important question, not only to me but many, many Americans. As far as I know it may all be a lie, I have not found such. Perhaps you have?
From Jesse Binnall UNDER OATH
The opening statement from President Trumps lawyer Jesse Binnall before the Senate Homeland Security hearing on election fraud.
Thank you Mr. Chairman
Ranking member Peters and Members of this committee. This year thousands upon thousands of Nevada voters had their voices canceled out by election fraud and invalid ballots. Heres how it happened. On August 3,2020 After a rushed special session Nevada legislators made DRASTIC changes to the States election law by adopting a bill known as AB4. The vulnerabilities of this statute are obvious, it provided for universal mail voting without sufficient safeguards to authenticate voters or insure fundamental requirements that only one ballot was sent to each qualified voter. This was aggravated by election officials failure to clean known deficiencies in their voter roles. Because of AB4 the number of mail ballots rocketed from 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 in 2020. The election was inevitably riddled with FRAUD and our HOT LINE never stopped ringing. While the media and democrats accuse us of making it all up. Our team began CHASING DOWN EVERY LEAD. Our evidence team from data SCIENTIST and brave whistle blowers.
Here is what we found. Over 42,000: 42,000 PEOPLE voted more than once. Our experts were able to make this determination by REVIEWING the list of actual voters in comparing it to others with the same Name, Address, and Date of Birth. This method was able to catch people using different variations of the first name such as William and Bill and individuals who both registered both under a married name and a maiden name. At least 1,500 dead people are recorded as voting as shown BY COMPARING the list of mail voters with the social security DEATH RECORDS. More than 19.000 people voted even though they did not live in Nevada. This DOES NOT include military voters or students. These voters were Identified by comparing the list of voters in the US Postal National Change of address data base among other sources. About 8,000 people voted from non-existent address. Here we cross reference voters with the coding accuracy support system. Which allowed out experts to identify UNDELIVERABLE ADDRESSES. Over 15,000 voters were cast from commercial or VACANT address. Our experts found these voters by analyzing OFFICIAL US postal records that FLAG non residential address in addresses vacant more than 90 days. INCREDIBLY almost 4,000 non-citizens also voted. As determined by comparing official DMV records of NON-CITIZENS from the list of ACTUAL voters. The list goes on and on. All in all, our experts identify 130,000 UNIQUE instances of voter fraud In Nevada but the actual number is almost certainly higher. Our data scientist made these calculations NOT BY ESTIMATIONS OR STATISTICAL STAND POINTS but by analyzing the list of ACTUAL voters with other list which are PUBLICLY available. To put it simply, they explain there methods so others COULD CHECK THEIR WORK.
(Our evidences has never been refuted only ignored) Two Clark County technical employees came forward completely independent of each other and explained that they discovered the number of votes reported by voting machines and stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed; at night and when they were reopened the next morning. In other words, votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night. When we ATTEMPTED to verify the integrity of the machines, we allowed only a useless visual inspection of the OUTSIDE of USB drive. We were denied a forensic examination.
Finally our investigation also uncovered a campaigns to illegally insensitive votes form marginally populations by requiring people to prove they voted to receive raffle tickets for gift cards, televisions and more. Out determined team verified these irregularities without ANY of the tools of law enforcement, such as Grand juries, Subpoenas, or FBI Agents. instead we had less than a month to to use critical thinking and elbow grease to compile our evidence. We tried to obtain testimony or documents from Clark co officials but they obstructed and stonewalled. When we filed suit, state officials , even courts delayed proceedings for days then offered us merely hours to brief and argue our cases. In wrapping up Mr Chairman, these findings are disturbing, alarming, and unacceptable TO A FREE SOCITY. Our free and fair election tradition is a precious treasure that we are in charge with protecting. Governments by the consent of govern is hard to win and EASY TO LOSE. Every time a fraudulent or illegal is cast the vote of an honest citizen is cancelled out. Thank you.
