[/quote]
According to his LinkedIn profile, Michael Lewis is the Digital Marketing Manager at NTD
NTD also produces the Epoch Times
Both productions are Falun Gong crazy.
AND?
Let me ask you, Do you consider this news companies founders spiritual beliefs the issue here? Could it be they are opposed to the struggling from restless oppression from communism, especially the ccp of their very own country of the News outlets' founders? I for one do not believe in their spirituality. No more than I follow that of the dalai lama. I do believe they are fighting the oppression, (or struggling if you will), of communist for their freedom of religion. Do you consider that a bad thing? Do you think Lying about your country or mine will further their cause with either country, mine or yours? What is your point Milo? .
And my point is you are being used as a stalking horse for their aims.
The video is a slick production by an organisation claiming to be a News org but in reality is the media arm of a political movement that doesn?t readily identify the origins of the work or owners.
And if we take into consideration their background and experience with China then the commentary around civil disobedience requiring the Military is grossly hypocritical. ahem can anyone say Tiananmen Square.
As for the evidence of voter fraud; yes affidavits and more are evidence, but evidence submitted to a court of law doesn?t mean it is material, admissible or noteworthy.
Anyone can make a statement and sign that in their opinion it is factual, it?s up to the courts to decide if it?s truth or bull-dust.
>And my point is you are being used as a stalking horse
for their aims.
You say "you" are being used as a stalking horse for their aim. America as well as Australia was mentioned in this report. Their aim of using each of us as a stalking horse is what? Opposing communism? Seeking Freedom?
Now to the point, Let me ask you; Which
part of the news video concerning America is false? Which
part of the video concerning Australia is false?
> The video is a slick production by an organisation claiming to be a News org but in reality is the media arm of a political movement that doesn?t readily identify the origins of the work or owners.
Again, let's take a closer look, what part of this report is false? All? half? One fourth? Other?
> And if we take into consideration their background and experience with China then the commentary around civil disobedience requiring the Military is grossly hypocritical. ahem can anyone say Tiananmen Square.
Explain please; Was the demonstrators at Tiananmen Square peaceful? Were they burning down the cities of China? Rioting and looting? Killing fellow citizens? Attacking the police? Etc and so on? They may very well have been doing so. I do not know much about this.
Hypocritical you say.
It would seem every freedom loving person, here in America, and those even as far away as Oz would be concerned of widespread voter fraud here or anywhere in the world? There again, We should not be surprised that so many in foreign countries such as yours has swallowed the Bull dust of the left. How could we, would we, or should we be surprised or expect any different when so many here in America has swallowed it as well?
Sad..
> As for the evidence of voter fraud; yes affidavits and more are evidence, but evidence submitted to a court of law doesn't mean it is material, admissible or noteworthy.
> Anyone can make a statement and sign that in their
opinion it is factual, it's up to the courts to decide if it's truth or bull-dust.
Eyewitness, election OFFICIALS, postal workers, along with many others have signed SWORN statements stating facts of voter fraud they actually eye witnessed, yes, voter fraud and law breaking. A shiftless person may very well sign a (
statement of opinion).
A witness will sign a Sworn Affidavit of facts and events witnessed.
