Ps, My granddaughter who is 11 got her first one this year on the last day.
Congratulations for your Granddaughter gww..
Phillip
I agree, congratulations to her!
Yeah, I hear some guys say that to 'splain it off but the guys I hang with say that they don't take less than optimum shots. What they should do, rather than allow x number of deer taken is allow x number of shots to be fired. Wound one and too bad for the 'hunter'. Then they'd take less pot-shots.
Not only would this be impossible to police, this plan sounds like it would
increase the amount of wounded deer walking around suffering. What if it takes multiple shots to drop a deer? Isn't it more humane to have to fire multiple times but be sure you make the kill? It's unrealistic to assume that you can drop a moving animal with a single perfect shot every time.
I've never hunted, but when we butcher our goats, we take great pains to be sure the shot is optimal because we can. We train the goats to come and eat at the dispatch spot so they aren't worried by the change in routine on butchering day, and they are tame enough that my father can shoot them point blank, and so far, we've never had anything other than a perfect, instantaneous, humane kill. But I can't imagine it's easy to duplicate that scenario when you are shooting a moving, wild target from comparatively far away. That perfect shot exists, and every hunter I've ever talked to strives to hit it, but it's unreasonable to think it's going to work out that way every time.