WAS OJ GUILTY?

[salvo]

Is this guy?



Sal

[William Bagwell]

Why not both? OJ for murder and what's his face (Thurman?) for lying and tampering with evidence. IMHO both jury's, criminal and civil made the correct verdict.

[salvo]

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-kyle-rittenhouse-trial

[William Bagwell]

Obviously mistaken in who was pictured! Have not followed that case...

[salvo]

Hi Folks,

WOW!!!

https://twitter.com/jasonrantz/status/1458609014607007749

Sal

[salvo]

LETS GO BIDEN.

NOT EVEN A PRESIDENT.

Look at your own son,... you Richard Head!

Sal

[salvo]

Hi Folks,

Sometimes things are just too heavy for a happy hobby forum,

https://clarion.causeaction.com/2021/11/07/huh-the-fbi-lost-drone-footage-from-rittenhouse-shooting-why-was-there-a-fbi-drone-there-in-the-first-place/

Sal

[salvo]

Hi Folks,

The more things change,... the more they stay the same.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6282173764001#sp=show-clips

Sal

[salvo]

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-why-kenosha-destroyed

[salvo]

Hi Folks,

No. He was not guilty.

Sal

[Kathyp]

OJ was not guilty because the jury found him not guilty.  Rittenhouse is not guilty for the same reason.  There is much evidence to support the second verdict.  Less for OJ, but that's how it goes.

We are not guaranteed an accurate outcome.  Just a fair trial and decision by a jury.