Since we are diverging here, I can see both sides of the extinction debate. I keep coming back to human intervention though.
I?m still very young in the bee realm, but I think endangered, in the practical sense, means without human intervention. As I understand it, it is unknown if bees would survive the mites, viruses, beetles and moths without human intervention.
Honeybees are most successful due to commercial production. If the economy or some other factor other than environmental took a turn that caused commercial beekeepers to let their bees go feral, would survive as a species. Sure some of us would keep small qualities going, others would join in I?m sure, but without human intervention, are the secure?
On the flip side, as things are, we will continue to have honey bees for the foreseeable future.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk