>To put it in perspective Andrew Bolt is almost the Australian equivalent of Tucker Carlson.
No the conservative government we have is not in the process of silencing other conservatives.
And yes she was arrested, in her own home, shock horror! For breaching the law.<
Milo, I have heard at least a couple reports from sky news just recently. Mr Bolt may have been one of the reporters that I watched. I am not sure, I will look back and see. The couple of news reports that I did watch were good and fairly accurate in my opinion. Also, I did reply to your reply here at the coffeehouse, about the foreign reporter from South America who was here, covering the election. Just for clarification and information, he was actually boots on the ground In Pennsylvania, and an eye witness to what was happening there. I highlighted briefly what he had to say. Which I think is reasonable. Thought Mr Bolt may not agree. In my country Mr Bolt would have a right to his opinion even though he gave if from thousands of miles away. As far as I know he did not go to Pennsylvania, therefore certainly he was not an eye witness as the reporter from South America was. If you notice I did not say either of you should mind his own business as Skeg put it to me "tend to your own backyard." Nor did I say suggest that to you either. Your opinion is welcome in my opinion.
Now since you have again brought up the pregnant woman's case, (which I was invited to mind my own business about), I will once again respond. I reserve that right to respond. I watched the recorded video and report of the pregnant Mother being arrested in her home on another source, thought it has been a while. For Skegs sake I again remind you, he politely suggested I mind my own business when it comes to OZ, a habit that I had already put into place from the start, without his asking. If you look closely to your Downunder heading I rarely reply or say much there as It is for you fellows there to enjoy without my input or butting in. (Minding my own business). However,
Since you have brought this up the again, I will ask what law did she break? I Know nothing about your laws there. Did she go out of her home illegally? Was she seen out gathering a group in an unlawfully unobtrusive manner? From what I understood she simply did not agree with a mandate there and wanted to speak of her mind and opinion about the matter, and did so on facebook? Possibly suggesting to having a peaceful protest, and said as much on Facebook. Is this true? I am curious to the letter of law and am again asking since this has once again been brought up. If you do not want to talk of this any further you can also tell me to mind my own business. lol