Appears to me, the fella likes mason bees better than honey bees. Small voice in the wilderness, I doubt his message against honey bees goes very far.
Blessings
As LJ has put, plenty of regional bias in the view expressed. Whether true for Canada or the USA I have no idea
but certainly the impact of EHB has proven detrimental to Aussie natives and native fauna. Enough has been
done to have legislation put in place around exclusion zones and plenty is being put out there in the public's
media landscape to raise awareness of EHB around natives. Hence we have breeders issuing passive genetic lines
and a huge push from the science lobbyists and sympathetic b'keeps to have Tets established in orchards and
gardens.
On that...?.. many urbanites want to have a beehive in close proximity, is one reason why FlowHive [tm] was so
successful in crowd funding. Our Tets are ideal for that setting but once again there are people out there who
in seeing Tets selling for up to $600AUD are climbing on board with colonies for sale. Tets are an entirely different
kettle of fish to EHB, yet once set the colony will survive unaided for decades.... but $400 plus..?... those b'keeps
in this are "having a lend".
Back on topic... what is not addressed in the article is the cropping issue. MAN introduced cropping over
Lands so as to feed people. Apis.m.* - particulary Linnaeus - are often aggressive towards natives on the flower
yet it is not within my past experience nor can I envisage anything changing where natives can be relied on
for wide acre pollination.
The 'danger' then of views expressed in the article - and in many a like work in this Country - is the public
takeup of nonsense in then puting in place "sanction Woolworths sweetcorn" campaigns in thinking they are
"saving the bees"... different bee, same reaction.
Can anyone ssay "GI Canola"?????.... heh
Bill